Why you should reject the numbers game and statistical approaches

For four straight election cycles, Democrats have ignored research from the fields of cognitive linguistics and psychology that the most effective way to communicate with other humans is by telling emotional stories.

Tell the politicians and the hustlers to live and let live.  At about 4:01 for you heads.

My thing on this blog is to not tell you better routines – but to develop your mind for the game.  The foundation of all game is understanding human psychology.  Meeting girls is just one avenue of that psychology. So a good source of “non-game” game comes from anything where people are involved.

Archie, “How many chicks do I need to talk to until…I get laid…until I get a girlfriend.”

What the election taught *some* Democrats (the smart ones) that you can not depend on stats and data crunching to win elections.

So the brute force approach to game – although useful for LEARNING – but not for actual pulling.

Telling emotional stories is a big key to the game.  During the approach, during the attraction generation, during the trust build, AFTER YOU READ THE BIBLE (Because that’s what we’re all trying to do, meet a nice Christian girl, right?!?)

“The human mind is a story processor, not a logic processor,” as social psychologist Jonathan Haidt has written).

Convincing a voter—challenging an existing frame—is no small task. “When you hear a word, its frame (or collection of frames) is activated in your brain,” writes Lakoff. As a result, “if a strongly held frame doesn’t fit the facts, the facts will be ignored and the frame will be kept.”

What? Frame?  Scientists use “game” terms?

No, we use scientific terms.

So let this be a seed for your next game idea.  When you’re chatting up a lady, ask yourself what emotional story am I telling her?

• What am I saying with my words?
• With my body language?
• With my actions?

Because just chatting chicks up in series is not enough.

-Archie